[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH Reorg: Why Bring In Political Biases?
Mani Varadarajan (mani@srirangam.esd.sgi.com) wrote:
: In article <4cb5f0$bng@babbage.ece.uc.edu> ntiwari@rs3.esm.vt.edu (N. Tiwari) writes:
: > Your post is self contradictory. The post of Partha was pretty
: > political. It explicitly blamed the cow belt and VHP politics for issues
: > related to dowry. YOu somehow think that such type of mix of religion and
: > politics is good, and is fit enough to be posted in s.r.h.
: >
: > But when Rajiv Varma posts something similar (like the invasion of Islamic
: > warriors) and explores the impact of that on the Hindus, you get pissed
: > off. Things like these are obscure, and fit enough for talk.religion.hindu.
: I have always maintained that neither of these posts
: are appropriate for soc.religion.hindu.moderated. I have
: *never* approved in any way of the acceptance of Partha's
: posts.
: Please do not put words in my mouth.
On one hand you complain that progressives do not post to s.r.h.
And on other hand, you will disapprove posts of the type like
those made by Partha. In fact, that is precisely the type of
posts which you can expect from a progressive. The post smells
of progressivism, (not my term) and should have been there.
Further, you have yet to show me how Ajay's biases prevented
postings of the other kind.
--
Nachiketa Tiwari
=====================================================
750 Tall Oaks Drive 118 Patton Hall
Apt. # 3600 I Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA 24060. Blacksburg, VA 24061.
(540)-951-3979 (540)-231-4611
=====================================================
