[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH reorganization
In article <4cgd2k$jgt@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
Dhruba Chakravarti <dchakrav@netserv.unmc.edu> wrote:
> A third insinuation is
>that the silence of the proposed moderators is evidence that they do not
>want to be a party to this reorganization plan anymore.
I on the other hand feel that the proposed moderators have done a
right thing in not getting involved in what have turned out to be
personal rivalries. if a CFV wins the vote for reorganization,
they should be able to run a unified hindu group without accusations
of bias and partisanship.
