[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Why I support soc.religion.hindu: Reorganisation
In article <4cgdqs$jpp@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
N. Tiwari <ntiwari@rs3.esm.vt.edu> wrote:
>GOPAL Ganapathiraju Sree Ramana (gopal@ecf.toronto.edu) wrote:
>Second, the moderators need not know Hinduism and in its full
>complexity. However what we do need are the following:
>
>1. A moderator who is not prejudiced, in the sense that (s)he permits
> all the posts, representing all the viewpoints reg. Hindu Dharma.
>
>2. A moderator, who filters out articles, which involve personal
> attacks, and profanities.
>
>3. A moderator, who rejects articles, which are not related to the
> Hindu Dharma.
>
Do i understand properly: you mean moderation is to be by our peers?
so, IF for a moment we keep aside our views on the traffic, you dont
have specific objections to the proposed moderators?
