[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH reorganization
One of the major objections raised by Pai jis was that due to some make
believe incompetency of SRH moderator, traffic of Hinduism related
articles was going to SCI. As an evidence they referred to Karna-Eklavya,
Ambedkar, Determinants of Hindu defeats, et al articles.
As I had pointed out that these articles were posted in response to some
articles which were posted by detractors of Hinduism in an effort to
defame Hinduism and mislead the readership. Hence, the aforementioned
articles were posted as a response on SCI. It is rather absurd on the SRH
reorg proponents part to claim that these articles should be posted to
SRH. Follow-ups are always posted to the ngs where the original were posted.
Apart from above, the SRH reorg proponents have not produced any other
examples of flow of Hinduism related articles to other ngs.
IMO, it would be best to withdraw the RFD: SRH reorg.
regards,
Rajiv
