[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Why I support soc.religion.hindu: Reorganisation
In article <4cgdqs$jpp@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
N. Tiwari <ntiwari@rs3.esm.vt.edu> wrote:
>GOPAL Ganapathiraju Sree Ramana (gopal@ecf.toronto.edu) wrote:
>: "Why moderators be picked by proponents"
>: ------------------------------------------
>: N Tiwari argued that multiple moderators can be picked up by
>: Ajay Shah or we the netters. Some questions puzzle me in this
>: regard:
>: (1) Was Ajay Shah selected by netters? (I donot know, actually)
>: (2) Is it practicable to select moderators by us the netters?
>: how, and who will be the independent vote taker?
>: (3) Has Ajay Shah any reservations about the moderators proposed?
>: (4) Have the proposers in any way exceeded their mandate-as-proposers
>: in suggesting the list of moderators? is it not done routinely
>: in RFDs?
>: (5) IF it is legitimate to propose moderators in an RFD why
>: cant we give a little credit to the proponents for doing a
>: complete job?
>
>If I remember correctly, Ajay was not picked up by netters.
>In fact, there was no s.r.h for a very long time. Although
>we did have s.r.islam, s.r.christianity ... But s.r.h was
>not there. A lot of this had to do with the inactivity in
>matters of organization and service, when it comes to people
>like me, who are Hindus. And in such a situation, it is to
>the credit of Ajay Shah, that he and a couple of his friends
>got this idea of s.r.h and created it.
Ofcourse every one is greatful to Ajay Shah for creation of
s.r.h. and for devoting his time and efforts in moderating
the arh / srh groups.
But, I sincerely feel that the proponents too deserve
some encouragement for their stupendous enthusiam to make
the group more effective.
Even at this moment they are asserting: that Ajay Shah
is welcome to join the moderators. (I am therefore not
convinced at all that they are out there to oust Ajay Shah)
With the offer of moderatorship to Ajay Shah (still open) and
their not being on the moderator panel, it is difficult for
me to believe that they will have control over the s.r.h.
>As to Ajay's reservations about the proposed moderators, let
>him answer that.
