[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: ARTICLE : Sikh view of Hinduism
In article <ghenDzABny.Ku8@netcom.com>,
Rajwinder Singh <rajwi@otto.bu.edu> wrote:
>Shrisha Rao (shrao@nyx.net) wrote:
>
>: >And if you indeed are qualified, let us have detailed discussion on
>: >the soundness of basis of Sikhism, there will be many interested people
>: >on soc.religion.sikhism too.
>
>: Very well, then let us start with the extant issues; please give me
>: answers to the queries I raised about the arguments against Krishna
>: being God, etc., in consultation with interested people in
>: soc.religion.sikhism or otherwise. We can take things from there.
>
>Vaaheguroo ji Ka Khalsa, Vaehguroo ji ki Fateh.
>
>Good. Now that we have agreed to the topic, I suggest you take the
>first indispensable step and learn the details of Sikh religion so that
>we can begin our dialogue. meanwhile, if you have any suggested reading for
>me, let me know the books.sources and I will be happy to check them out.
>I am always very interested in discussing Sikhism by itself or in
>comparative dialogue.
Sorry, but that's an idle dodge. I am not interested either in
learning Sikhism in detail, or in prescribing a reading course in
Vedanta for you. Such is neither a meaningful first step, nor is it
indispensable for further discussion; a participant in a discussion
has to know his *own* position well, but it is not necessary that he
know the countervailing view as well. I'd just like you to give me
specific responses to the points I made against Gobind Singh's claims,
that's all. For one thing, unless there is a proper response, one has
no inclination to study Sikhism because it is not human nature to
study systems of thought that one has been able to successfully find
fault with.
Regards,
Shrisha Rao
>rajwinder singh
--
http://www.rit.edu/~mrreee/dvaita.html
