[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: ARTICLE : The third eye
In article <ghenE0H901.3o6@netcom.com>, Sourav <sourav@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> About Vivekananda's tantra vs. Madhva's dvaita :-
>
> Indeed it is the case that Vivekananda did not write a brahma suutra
> bhaashya, so orthodox vedaantins will almost surely neglect him and
> who else could be more orthodox that the tattva vaadins.
Thank you.
> Shrisha Rao wrote:
> [...]
> > Your brand is one that involves such chimerisms as a "third eye,"
> > etc.
> [...]
>
> I believe, mantra drashtaas also have darshan of the Shruti mantras and also
> of their apaurusheyatva, and indeed mantra drashtaas are to be believed
> because that very Shruti acknowledges their honesty and integrity.
That's just your belief, and has nothing to do with the doctrines of
either Vivekananda or Madhva (not the latter's, especially, since that
argument is specifically denounced as non-sustainable therein). For
that reason, it is not appropriate under the rubric of "About
Vivekananda's tantra vs. Madhva's dvaita" which you chose.
Regards,
Shrisha Rao
--
http://www.rit.edu/~mrreee/dvaita.html
