 |
||
|
||
| Advertise with us! |
|
|
I think what you mean is, "Why do some Hindus support the Hare Krishna
group when its philosophy neither recognizes nor agrees with the premise of
what is today called Hinduism?"
I think if you compare Srila Prabhupada's Bhagavad-Gita with that of any
other popular Hindu group, you will see why. Srila Prabhupada (as well as
other Vaishnavas) have not attempted to innovate on the teachings of their
predecessors. Rather, they have simply presented the philosophy as it was
presented to them, and the result is that you get a philosophy which is
logical and internally consistent, as well as having the additional benefit
that it is based on scripture, not human speculation. I have often noted
that such candid treatment of the scripture makes it easier to digest
intellectually compared to other, Hindu approaches which more often than
not seem interested in making the scriptural teachings appealing to
Western, secularist minds.
However, don't take my word for it. By all means, see for yourself. Take
any Hindu Bhagavad-Gita, read it from beginning to end, then put it down
and write down what your understanding is. Then pick up Srila Prabhupada's
Bhagavad-Gita As It Is, read it beginning to end, and then put it down and
write what your understanding is. Compare the understandings you have
gotten from reading each, and you will see why there are Hindus which are
attracted to the Hare Krishna movement. Sincere spiritual seekers will
naturally be attracted to a world view which can stand the test of casual
scrutiny, which is at least consistent with the assumptions it begins with,
offers revealing insight into ourselves and the way we interact with the
world, and provides a practical means by which one can control the senses
and achieve the highest goal.
As for it not agreeing with the "Hindu faith," the fact of the matter is
that there is no such thing. Nowhere in the Vedas will you see this word
Hindu, at least, not in any capacity such that it can be interpreted to
refer to a permissive religion where one can do or worship as he pleases.
To call Vaishnavism, Shaivism, Shaktaism, Smaarthaism all as Hinduism is
like calling Christianity, Judaism, and Islam as Jordanism. The name Hindu
came because invading tribes noted that the civilization of the Indian
subcontinent flourished on the other side of Indus river. They therefore
took to calling the indigenous people "Sindhus," which later became
corrupted to the word "Hindus." Similarly, Christianity, Judaism, and Islam
developed around the Jordan river valley, but no one would think to say
that members of these different religious systems belong to the Jordanist
faith, now would they?
warm regards,
-- K
|
||
|
||
| Advertise with us! |
|
|