[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Tale and the SRH-reorg (Was: Re: Charter changes?)
Namaskar,
On 14 Jul 1996, Vivek Sadananda Pai wrote:
> In article <ghenDuGMCI.B7w@netcom.com>,
> Ajay Shah <ajay@mercury.aichem.arizona.edu> wrote:
> >Anotyher untruthful claim based on untruthful and perhaps intentionally skewed
> >statistics, compiled during the first 2-3 months of the operation of
> >soc.religion.hindu.
>
>
> Since I was the one who compiled most of the data on the SRH
>
> I downloaded the entire contents of the SRH archive one night, and
> stored it on my local machine. From this, I extracted all of the
The statistics are untruthful, skewed, mostly hoax and completely out of
date because :
1. They do not take into account the articles that were re-directed
manually from alt.hindu newsgroup (during the transition period)
2. They do not take into account machine down time during one major
upgrade to the system
3. They do not necessarily correlate the article arrival date and posting
date.
4. They were compiled during the first 2-3 months of the newsgroup
creation (December 1995).
Since then, we have multiple posting accounts, and our posting frequency
is 4-6 times a week, mostly five.
Since December, all the articles, as they arrived, with correct time
stamp are available to anyone who would like to personally disprove the
claim that Soc.Religion.Hindu posting rate is inconsistent with that of
other, similar, moderated newsgroups.
The entire reason for this less than truthful exercise is petty politics
and personal vendetta against me for standing up for the word Hindu in
the Vaishnava newsgroup. Noting more.
regards,
ajay shah
ajay@mercury.aichem.arizona.edu
References:
