[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH Reorg FAQ
GOPAL Ganapathiraju Sree Ramana wrote:
> sense to have a (1) well defined charter and moderation policy
> (2) the srh.moderated will focus on the *religious* aspects, and
> will be free from 'your quoran is bad, our gita is great' kind
> of posts, (3) and the group will not be cluttered with URL
> links, meetings-announcements, directions to venues, call-for
> actions, hate-filled discussion about the past historical
> misdeeds etc on the srh.moderated
Yeah, the new, reorganized, brand new srh will have only hate filled,
insulting articles about Ramakrishna, Vivekananda etc and also nasty innuendos
about shiva worshippers and "great" personalities. Ofcourse it will be done in
such a way that vague justifications can be given later. Thank you very much
for your campaign.
> It is so sad that being a moderator, you have chosen to
> refuse to take the opinion of readers through a usenet
> vote
>
> as some one put it:
>
> "moderators are dictators"
> "moderators own their groups"
> "moderators can block reorganization proposals if they dont like
> the first letter of the last name of the proponents"
Cute. However in my opinion enough justifications have been given against the
re-org. However, I do agree that the decisions of Dale Lawrence are not
consistent. I saw the post by Russ Allberry. They seem to have made up their
mind. It seems more important to get USENET reforms, before you can push this
RFD (at least seems like that to me).
Ramakrishnan.
--
Two monks were arguing about a flag. One said, "The flag is moving." The other
said, "The wind is moving." The sixth patriarch happened to be passing by. He
told them, "Not the wind, not the flag; mind is moving." - The Gateless Gate
