[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH Reorg FAQ
Namaskar,
On Mon, 15 Jul 1996, GOPAL Ganapathiraju Sree Ramana wrote:
>
> what bothers me is that instead of deciding whether *majority* of
> readers consider the proposal as useful to the group, through a
> usenet vote, the proposal is being killed because the current
> moderator does not consent it.
Considering that the newsgroup *was indeed* created through a voting
process with an overwhelming majority, less than 3 months before the re-org
proposal, this is a rather weak argument.
The driving force behind the re-org proposal has never been that
it does not enjoy the support of the majority, but the fact that I
stood up for the word HINDU, during the creation of the Vaishnava newsgroup.
It is nothing more than personal vendetta and petty politics, that is behind
the re-org proposal. Nothing more.
regards,
ajay shah
ajay@mercury.aichem.arizona.edu
References:
