[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Tale and the SRH-reorg (Was: Re: Charter changes?)
In article <4sfglk$jth@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
Ajay Shah <ajay@mercury.aichem.arizona.edu> wrote:
>On Mon, 15 Jul 1996, Vivek Sadananda Pai wrote:
>> Ever since this discussion flared up again, the delay has dropped.
>> The archive of e-mail messages which the moderator has mentioned has
>> not been available for a long time - the permissions were not set
>> properly, and I repeatedly mentioned this, but nothing was done about
>> it.
>
>Ever since late November/December, our posting rate has been consistently
>4-6 postings a week. Mostly five. Any *honest* reader of this newsgroup
>will attest to this fact.
When the news archives were shut down and replaced with the e-mail
archives, documenting the posting rate became a much harder
task. However, I was still willing to do it to counter any charges.
However, the e-mail archives were not accessible, and though I
mentioned this _twice_, nothing was done about it.
Now, if in fact the posting rate has been 5 times a week since
December, then it should be easy for you to provide evidence of
that. It's been 7 months since then, and that means a little over 30
weeks. At 5 times weekly, there should be at least 150 separate
clearance cycles in that time.
I took the time and effort to document the clearance cycles and prove
my point. If you claim that there have been 5 weekly cycles since
then, could you or someone else provide statistics similar to the ones
found at http://www-ece.rice.edu/~vijaypai/srh-stats.html
Put aside accusations and provide facts. Only then will the discussion
be fruitful
>But then some people, contend that a untruthful contentions, repeated many
>many times automatically becomes truth...
>
>Truth, I believe, is the first casuality when personal vendetta and petty
>politics take center stage.
And how many times have you repeated the "personal vendetta" theory?
Does this qualify for the untruthful contention repeated ad nauseum?
-Vivek
