[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH Reorg FAQ
In article <4sfgl4$jtf@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
Ramakrishnan Balasubramanian <rbalasub@ecn.purdue.edu> wrote:
>Yeah, the new, reorganized, brand new srh will have only hate filled,
>insulting articles about Ramakrishna, Vivekananda etc and also nasty innuendos
>about shiva worshippers and "great" personalities.
What's the nasty innuendo? I've asked you before, and it seems that
you still wish to propagate your flat-out lies.
I've got the original article, and I'll be more than happy to repost
it if you wish to continue with your claim that there was any innuendo
or insult to Shiva worshippers in those comments.
If you don't wish to be specific, then it goes to show that your point
isn't to actually do anything productive, but to conduct a campaign of
lies by suggesting that your opponent said things which he did
not. When proof is offered, you still don't seem to want it, so I can
only conclude that you are intentionally being untruthful.
-Vivek
