[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Status on RFD on reorganization of Soc.Religion.Hindu
In article <4shpfn$bo1@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
Ajay Shah <ajay@mercury.aichem.arizona.edu> wrote:
>because it provides hardware support (sponsorship), and archival support.
>Nothing more... Of course, anyone can create archives for SRH. Archives
>are, just as in SRV, not official.
If the archives are unofficial, why are they part of the approval
message added at the bottom of approved posts?
If they archives are nothing more than the moderator's personal
archives, why are they being misleadingly attached to messages as
though they were official?
If the archives are unofficial and personal, why do they contain
information not available to the general public - i.e. the letters
themselves, rather than the articles?
In other words, if the claim is that the archives are unofficial,
then the moderator is showing preferential treatment to those by
adding information about them to the approval message.
Can authors request that their own sites be added to the approval
message? Why or why not?
-Vivek
