Re: No political articles on SRH? Really?

• To: soc-religion-hindu@uunet.uu.net
• Subject: Re: No political articles on SRH? Really?
• From: rajaroy@ecf.toronto.edu (Roy Raja)
• Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 10:43:32 -0400
• Fake-Sender: news@ecf.toronto.edu (News Administrator)
• Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu, news.groups, soc.culture.indian, alt.jyotish, alt.flame.jay-stevens
• Organization: University of Toronto, Engineering Computing Facility
• References: <4sec78$clm@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <4sfgng$jum@babbage.ece.uc.edu>
• Sender: News Administrator <news@ecf.toronto.edu>

In article <4sfgng$jum@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
Vivek Sadananda Pai  <vivek@cs.rice.edu> wrote:
>
>There is a difference between "of interest" and directly relevant. Is
>the article directly relevant to Hinduism? No. Is the article of
>interest to Hindus engaged in political power gyrations, etc.,
>etc. Yes.
>

   If you took a look at the name of this newsgroup, it says .hindu and
  not .hinduism. So anything of relevance to Hindus is most welcome here.

   In fact I am afraid that if unfortunaely control of this newsgroup is
   wrested by Pais and Rao, this newsgroup will become a ground for
   propagating anti-hindu propaganda. I want to see this newsgroup remaining
   faithful to Hindus, and I don't expect that from people who claim they
   are not hindus. If you vaishnavs are not hindus, then why are you bothered
   about SRH. SRH is a nice place I visit every morning, but since you guys
   started this reorganisation proposal out of personal vendetta, you have
   destroyed the peace of mind I used to get here. Please leave SRH alone,
   do whatever you do with SRV.

    Raja 

• Prev: ARTICLE : Who decided that all vaishnavs are not hindus?
• Next: Re: ARTICLE : NO need for RFDs
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread

Advertise with us!	This site is part of Dharma Universe LLC websites. Copyrighted 2009-2015, Dharma Universe.