[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: No political articles on SRH? Really?
In article <4sfgng$jum@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
Vivek Sadananda Pai <vivek@cs.rice.edu> wrote:
>
>There is a difference between "of interest" and directly relevant. Is
>the article directly relevant to Hinduism? No. Is the article of
>interest to Hindus engaged in political power gyrations, etc.,
>etc. Yes.
>
If you took a look at the name of this newsgroup, it says .hindu and
not .hinduism. So anything of relevance to Hindus is most welcome here.
In fact I am afraid that if unfortunaely control of this newsgroup is
wrested by Pais and Rao, this newsgroup will become a ground for
propagating anti-hindu propaganda. I want to see this newsgroup remaining
faithful to Hindus, and I don't expect that from people who claim they
are not hindus. If you vaishnavs are not hindus, then why are you bothered
about SRH. SRH is a nice place I visit every morning, but since you guys
started this reorganisation proposal out of personal vendetta, you have
destroyed the peace of mind I used to get here. Please leave SRH alone,
do whatever you do with SRV.
Raja
