[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: No political articles on SRH? Really?
In article <4t1r8m$h9v@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
Rajiv Varma <rvarma@stallion.jsums.edu> wrote:
>>a trivial point," has led to this discussion where we have had a
>>useful exchange about each other's perceptions about the role and
>>relationship of religion and politics, especially in the context of a
>>soc.religion.* newsgroup. And that, I submit, is surely something
>>gained, even if poor Vivek is the loser in the process, for having
>>caught flak yet again for his personal role in the matter.
>
>Hmmmmmm ..... {thinking aloud}
>
> .... That is modertor's job, not Vivek's.
>
> {/thinking aloud}
Hmmmm.... {thinking aloud}
Rajivji, would you have told Gandhiji that the whole "salt issue"
should not be his concern, but rather that of the British government?
{\thinking aloud}
Now that we've all shown we can use cute non-existent tags, the real
issue still remains - I've asked a series of questions trying to
clarify the vague points of the charter. Is that my _job_? I have no
idea, but I don't recall anyone saying that I couldn't ask questions
about the charter.
Let me put it this way - so long as questions remain and I'm
interested in those questions, I see no reason not to ask them.
More interestingly, as long as answers are not forthcoming, it
seems all the more pertinent to ask why such answers are not
forthcoming.
-Vivek
