[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH Reorg FAQ
GOPAL Ganapathiraju Sree Ramana (gopal@ecf.toronto.edu) wrote:
: [will be posted to srh separately -- in addition to sci and news.groups]
: In article <4skjv0$abb@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
: Ajay Shah <ajay@mercury.aichem.arizona.edu> wrote:
: >On Wed, 17 Jul 1996, GOPAL Ganapathiraju Sree Ramana wrote:
: >
: >>
: >> how can the proponents shove anything on the throats of srh readership?
: >> they have been asking for a vote on the proposed separation of articles
: >> into thoese that are primarily religious and those others that deal
: >> with any other aspect hindu and hindism. if you are referring to the
: >
: >SRH charter, voted on overwhelmingly provides sanction for the posts that
: >include various aspects of Hindu dharma, culture and issues. It was
: >posted yesterday, and is available in the archives.
: i know that the *current* charter allows almost anything conceivable.
: i hardly find any moderation going on srh, and that is why i consider
: the reorg proposal is an improvement to the current srh.
: i do not agree with the notion that once a charter is voted on,
: it should run for ever. there is no need for any third party
: assessment. you can yourself see any other religious group, and see
: if srh seems to be a moderated group at all. what is wrong in
: asking for a change of charter and a moderation policy?
Nothing wrong there. But I hope you will also accept the
argument that every thing should not be changed on a
daily basis. In my judgement, I do not see anything that
is bad enough to provoke a voting on the entire s.r.h.
Rather, let us talk about certain issues, and suggest that
moderator may tune up the existing policies to these needs
and requirements.
--
Nachiketa Tiwari
=====================================================
750 Tall Oaks Drive 118 Patton Hall
Apt. # 3600 I Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA 24060. Blacksburg, VA 24061.
(540)-951-3979 (540)-231-4611
=====================================================
