[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: ARTICLE : SRH Reorganization
In article <ghenDv34FM.Gqy@netcom.com>,
N. Tiwari <ntiwari@rs3.esm.vt.edu> wrote:
>Shrisha Rao (shrao@nyx.net) wrote:
>: In article <4skjn3$a8t@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
>: <SVAISHNAVI@BOSCO.MEIS.UAB.EDU> wrote:
>: >
>: > The removal of Ajay Shah as moderator of this newsgroup would be
>: >monumental error. The given reasons for his removal do not seem to match the
>: >experiences of most people.
>
>: Where were those reasons given? How do you have access to the
>: experiences of most people?
>
>The same could be said of you to. What are the reasons. What
>access do you have to the experiences of most folks. Also,
>by responding to the charge that Ajay's removal will be
>"monumental error" you have actually committed a slip. A
>Freudian slip. That the aim IS actually to remove Ajay.
Sorry, but no cigar. You didn't even come close.
1> I never said anything about the experience so most people, unlike
the person I was responding to; as such, the question does not apply
to me.
2> I don't know where from you get your notions of logic (or
psychology: a Freudian slip most certainly didn't happen here; in any
case, it is not at all likely to happen in writing, and is much more
likely to happen in speech), but my asking for proof that the
presumptions behind the questions asked, does not show that I accept
them as true. In fact, if I did, I would not have asked. If you
respond to my charge that you beat your wife by pointing out that you
haven't got a wife, would that be (a) a Freudian slip, or (b) an
acceptance of the fact that you do indeed beat your wife? According
to you, it should be both.
>Despite all the good politics that he will be one of the
>4 moderators.
That's not even a proper sentence.
Regards,
Shrisha Rao
>Nachiketa Tiwari
