[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH Reorg FAQ
In article <ghenDv34Fq.Gs6@netcom.com>,
N. Tiwari <ntiwari@rs3.esm.vt.edu> wrote:
>Nothing wrong there. But I hope you will also accept the
>argument that every thing should not be changed on a
>daily basis.
This, of course, is impossible, since an RFD takes quite a bit longer
than a day, and there is a minimum time between any changes to a
newsgroup. So, while you might like to try to paint the reorg
proponents as people trying to change things "on a daily basis," it
simply isn't true.
>Rather, let us talk about certain issues, and suggest that
>moderator may tune up the existing policies to these needs
>and requirements.
Interestingly enough, I can't even get answers to certain issues, much
less try to talk about them. For example,
a) I asked about the human rights violations posts, and I've received
no reply.
b) I asked about posts which promote drug use, and I received no reply.
c) I asked about a certain poster who stopped receiving rejection notices,
and whose posts selectively stopped appearing on SRH, and I received no
reply.
d) I asked for the raw data supporting the claimed 1996 stats, and I
received no reply.
e) I asked about the claim that the SRH archives are "unofficial", and
I received no reply.
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>Mail posts to: ghen@netcom.com : http://www.hindunet.org/srh_home/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The moderator has stated that these archives are not official, so they
are assumed to be the personal archives of one person or group. If
that is the case, why is this information being added to every post?
Can other people suggest sites that they'd also like to see added? If
the sites are all unofficial, why bother adding them to the official
approval message at all?
-Vivek
