[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: ARTICLE : SRH Reorganization
In article <4tlkpo$p3r@maze.dpo.uab.edu>,
Sandeep Vaishnavi <svaishnavi@bosco.meis.uab.edu> wrote:
> A Texan thing, is it? *Hyuk* seems to conjure up the media's
>portrayal of nerds. But then again, perhaps it's apt in your case.
Mr. Vaishnavi, so far you've shown you're expert at insulting others,
but you've shown you have little regard for the truth.
>>By all means, dig up that article, post and, and show me where ISKCON
>>is even mentioned _once_ in connection with that children's book. I
>>suspect that right now, you're about to grow very quiet, or that
>>you'll just once again shift the focus of attack.
>
> Clearly, Mr. Pai, you have no ethical qualms with lying. Let me
>quote your post (July 19, 1996, 16:29:03):
By all means, quote whatever you want, but recall what you mentioned -
you said that you'd show that I used ISKCON's name in connection with
the children's book. I didn't. That's why I said you'd either get
quiet or shift the focus of attack, which is what you did. I note that
you don't mention the children's book even once in your article, and
_that_ was your claim.
> "Many sections have changed based on reader feedback, and since
>the goal of the site is to honor Srila Prabhupada correctly, I'm always
>willing to consider things which would aid in that goal." [Hmmm...let's
>see...who would the founder of ISKCON be? Perhaps Srila Prabhupada? Do
Oh, cute - now you've made the jump that anyone who attempts to honor
Srila Prabhupada is automatically using ISKCON's name in other
matters. Again, you are incorrect.
>helped put together the Houston Temple's Janmastami T-shirts a year or
>two ago." [What Houston temple would that be? Perhaps ISKCON's Houston
Once again, Mr. Vaishnavi, you've switched the topic of attack.
>temple? Hmmm...] Looks like I've called your bluff, Mr. Pai.
> If you have any integrity, Mr. Pai, you'll admit to your lying.
Actually, Mr. Vaishnavi, I believe it's you who are lying. Here
are the quotes that you were supposed to defend:
SV> Look, Vivek, you yourself had a posting not too long ago where
SV> you extolled your work for ISKCON (you talked about a children's book,
I asked you to produce a single quote linking that book to ISKCON in
any way, and you didn't.
And remember what started this off, when you said:
SV> What's even more disturbing to me
SV> is that these few individuals are using ISKCON's name in this vindictive,
SV> vendetta-like action.
Have you provided any evidence of anyone _using_ ISKCON's name? No.
> The claim I made was that you want to have revenge on Ajay Shah
>due to his opposition to SRV.
Suffering from a bad memory, Mr. Vaishnavi?
SV> Think about it - a person who is a vigorous, even aggressive ISKCON
SV> supporter flails Mr. Shah for not supporting SRV
So, it's clear that you've claimed that someone has flailed Mr. Shah
for not supporting SRV. I've asked twice, I believe, for you to
provide evidence for this statement, and so far, it appears that
you're trying to deny making this statement. Is that in fact your claim?
It would seem, Mr. Vaishnavi, that you either have a problem with
integrity or your thinking is quite muddled. In either case, I believe
that I've shown that you've made specific claims which you have been
unable to support. That's why I suggest that you're a liar.
-Vivek
