[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Tale and the SRH-reorg (Was: Re: Charter changes?)
In article <4r92vf$m37@larry.rice.edu>,
Vivek Sadananda Pai <vivek@cs.rice.edu> wrote:
[...] It seems that the only person in
>this discussion who doesn't believe that the reorg serves the readers
>of SRH well is the moderator, and this reason alone is causing all of
>the meta-discussions.
My memory tells me that there were others, such as N. Tiwari and
myself who did not support the reorganization.
Another point that I made at that time relates to ``we are willing to
have Ajay Shah as moderator'' ploy. The RFD said that one moderator
may be removed by other three (or was it two. now see why the 30 day
limit is needed). Given this, how could we have been sure that
Ajay Shah would not be removed the minute the newgroup messages
went out? Note that one of the proponents, Mani Varadarajan was
opposed to Ajay Shah from the RFD to soc.religion.hindu and another,
S. Rao, threatened retailiation for Shah's opposition to
soc.religion.vaishnava.
For the benefit of news.group readers, I would like to add that Ajay
Shah has appointed an appeals committee to hear appeals against
his rejections. Should we not give them time to see how this works
before another RFD goes out. [Yes, there must be another RFD. Too much
time has gone by since the original RFD for the CFV to proceed.
And if the new RFD does not explain why the appeals committee is
inadequate, we will know what is going on.]
--
Vidhyanath Rao It is the man, not the method, that solves
nathrao+@osu.edu the problem. - Henri Poincare
(614)-366-9341 [as paraphrased by E. T. Bell]
