[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: ARTICLE : SRH Reorganization
In article <ghenDw7M5D.9Iv@netcom.com>,
Ajay Shah <ajay@mercury.aichem.arizona.edu> wrote:
>It is the general policy of soc.religion.hindu to accept only those
>articles which are part of on-going debate on soc.religion.hindu and not
>accept the articles that are "imported debates" from other newsgroups.
Interestingly, the general policies have some exceptions other than
the ones granted to my posts. Specifically, I mention Bon Giovanni's
original accusations about SRV, which were deemed worthy of posting on
SRH. At that time, the reason for allowing such attacks was that they
were supposed to somehow be relevant to the SRH reorg.
>these posts on soc.religion.hindu, however, as a sign of respect to the
>readers of SRH, I will refrain from posting responses on this thread
>on soc.religion.hindu
But I note that you've decided to post attacks, specifically:
>I am hopeful that, soon, the proponents of spaming and censorship on SRV
>will drop the SRH re-org move driven by mean spirited petty politics and
>personal vendetta against this newsgroup and its moderator (me).
Once again, the spamming is being attributed by you to specific
people. If you have facts to support your allegation, then please do
make them known, because Badri, who tried to track down the spamming,
was unable to find out who was behind it, and I too am curious about
who was behind it.
One of the spammers wrote a post titled "F**k so-and-so," (where
so-and-so was the name of person who is admired by many on SRV) which
I found grossly distasteful, and I can't imagine that anyone who cared
for logical discussion would post something like that. However,
someone who was trying to make accusations later, might do so.
So, please, Mr. Shah - if you have proof of who was behind the
spamming, make that proof available. Otherwise, by making your
repeated suggestions that it was someone you dislike, you are showing
exactly who is engaging in petty politics and personal vendettas.
-Vivek
