[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH "moderation appeals committee" flaws
Dear moderator and other readers,
I don't believe that discussions about SRV, even though they might be
tagged with subject lines about SRH, are appropriate for SRH. Given
that the moderator and others have accused the reorg proponents of
trying to "flood" SRH, I see no good reason why such a topic should
even be allowed on SRH.
If I respond to the article, I will be accused of trying to trash SRH,
and if I don't respond to the article, I will be accused of hiding. If
the articles about the reorganization are going to be some sort of
attempt to make pointless accusations about the people involved, then
I am sad to observe that any semblance of logical rebuttal seems to be
absent.
It seems that there are people trying to make this a "personal" issue,
but contrary to the persistent claims, it hasn't been the proponents.
-Vivek
In article <ghenDvE586.JxC@netcom.com>,
Sankar Jayanarayanan <kartik@Eng.Auburn.EDU> wrote:
>Speaking about what is and is not fair, why were Bon's posts deliberately
>killed on SRV? Were you even aware of such a move? If so, did you protest
>vehemently against it?
