[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: ARTICLE : Just say no to "Hinduism" (was Re: ARTICLE : On attempting to define Hinduism)





Dhruba Chakravarti (dchakrav@netserv.unmc.edu) wrote:

>Dear Sri Jaldhar H. Vyas:

>Thank you for your comments, they are very interesting reading.  I must 
>however say that I was not particularly happy to read your observations 
>on Swamiji's scholarship.  I was wondering how else would you
>translate 'ekam sadviprA vahudhA vadanti agniM yamaM mAtarishvAnmAhuH.  
>RigVeda 1.164.46).

>Perhaps a case may be made for the view that purva-mimAMsA suggests
>shruti and smR^iti to be binding, but I am not so certain about
>uttara-mimAMsA. 

>As far as I know, Religion is not about eating preferences, in fact, as
>you surely must know, the word 'religion' means re-connect, re-connect
>with God, that is yoga.  I am optimistic that you do not want to say that
>yoga squarely consists of eating fish or eating vegetables.  Eating habits
>have their place in the life of the sAdhaka, but as I understand, do not
>define religion.  For evidence, I will say for now that, Swami Vivekanada 
>(who you seem to disagree with) characterized this attitude as 'my God is
>in my kitchen' (or something like that).  Many Gurus ask their disciples 
>to not eat non-vegetarian because a particular yogic method is not
>compatible with non-vegetarian eating practices.  Your observation that  
>eating preferences define different Hindu religions, is curious, but I am
>not convinced that you are correct.

>The teachings of Hinduism, whichever way you look at it, are expressly
>against intellectual interpretations of Scriptures.  The whole thing about
>parA-vidyA is thus said to be yogic, that is, revealed knowledge.  In
>fact, we should be happy that intellectuals do not dominate our religion.

Dear Dhrubababu

	That is an excellent piece of writing. 

Regards

Pradip


Advertise with us!
This site is part of Dharma Universe LLC websites.
Copyrighted 2009-2015, Dharma Universe.