[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
ARTICLE : Biased Reuters news reporting again ! ..is it any surprise ?
-
To: ghen@netcom.com
-
Subject: ARTICLE : Biased Reuters news reporting again ! ..is it any surprise ?
-
From: Pradip Gangopadhyay <pradip@lism.usc.edu>
-
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 1996 10:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
Sudheer (sns@popd.ix.netcom.com) wrote:
>Dear Friends...
>Here's a typical reporting by biased Reuters reporters.
>There's no need to mention "god Shiva's sexual organ" in this report
>whatsoever - especially since a explanation of the whole concept is
>not provided a simple "Holy Amarnath cave" would have sufficed. It is time
>that these biased half informed morons are stopped from defining Hinduism
>and values in 3-4 words.
>Please send email to the following addresses:
>editor@clari.net
>webmaster@reuters.com
>robert.crooke@reuters.com
>and register your complaints if you feel disgusted at this reporting.
>Reuters does this again and again. Only if we complain - can we get things
>to change !
>Recently when I complained to Reuters on a news report which gave more
>importance to a couple of Japanese deaths than the death of Indians in the
>same air disaster - I got a reply explaining the headline. IT PAYS TO
>COMPLAIN !
>PLEASE TAKE A FEW MINUTES AND REGISTER YOUR DISGUST...
>Thanks...
>Sudheer
An excellent suggestion.
Regards
Pradip
