[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: ARTICLE : Just say no to "Hinduism" (was Re: ARTICLE : On
-
To: soc-religion-hindu@uunet.uu.net
-
Subject: Re: ARTICLE : Just say no to "Hinduism" (was Re: ARTICLE : On
-
From: thambiu@skule.ecf.toronto.edu
-
Date: 5 Sep 1996 21:06:33 GMT
-
Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu
-
Organization: Bell Northern Research
-
References: <ghenDwHznC.9A0@netcom.com> <ghenDwLMnu.392@netcom.com> <ghenDwt2E2.MLD@netcom.com> <504jvn$b0m@news.ececs.uc.edu> <5077j1$rd3@news.ececs.uc.edu> <ghenDx64F8.1Ar@netcom.com> <ghenDx7vq5.5IL@netcom.com> <ghenDx9t0t.Bqx@netcom.com>
"Jaldhar H. Vyas" <jaldhar@braincells.com> wrote:
>A glance at a dictionary will easily solve this argument. I suggest you
>find one.
Doesn't it depend on which dictionary? After all, a dictionary written
by Vivekananda or Aurobindo would not serve your purpose now would it,
Jaldhar? :)
And don't tell me that all dictionaries give the same answer.
I think the Mahabharata would be a better authority in
solving this dispute. I suggest you read it.
Peace.
Ananda.