 |
||
|
||
| Advertise with us! |
|
|
Opinions on karma part (1):
I approach the law of karma as a scientist.
At first hand I have the idea therefore that karma is something manmade.
Not scriptural in a literal sense.
What are the scriptural texts that prove, the law of karma is not
something made up, later, by smart people, but something that is clearly
outlined in the original scriptures of Hindu and Vedic religion.
So where is the text that can been seen as the deepest foundation
explaining the law of karma.
At least, the texts that you repeat (refer to), are not clear enough for
this purpose. It can only be seen as a very tiny small part.
Can you please give me the places of books, where I can find the
foundation texts for the law of karma. Maybe it is possible for you, to
email me those texts?
Opinions part (2)
There is no text at all in Hindu or Vedic scriptures that speaks and
clarifies in depth the outline of the law of karma.
It is manmade for the entire.
You are right that few people approach myths and belief systems totally
scientificly.
Why don't people present the foundation texts that outline karma in the
original scriptures?
Can't they.
I think this is a good example of bad karma. The worst kind of karma I
can think of.
To hell with all those creeps.
If you happen to know of texts that make my karma negative because of
this conclusion, then, please let me know where I finally can get these
foundation scriptures to read.
Opinions part (3):
I read your page on karma.
What I was hoping for was the original texts in the scriptures of Hindu
or Veda's, that outline the precise deifinitions of the law of karma.
Since I can't find these texts, I have to assume that this law is
manmade in origine.
Invented thus, afterwards, based on a teaching, based on some lines in
the scriptural texts.
So this is subjective. Not objective mentioned in the original
scriptures.
The conclusion can then be no other, that in its own ball game, the
presentation of the law of karma, other then based directly on an
original text, is very bad karma.
Please show me the texts that prove me wrong.
Otherwise I have to stay in my conclusions, and even have to accuse you
of
irreasonable misleading people, with the claims to be both scientific
and scriptural.
You have a high regard of philosphy. It is the most precise form of
science. It is more precise than even maths, because it is thinking
about thinking, analyses about analyses.
Thus as a philosopher I challenge you. Are you a philosopher.
Then, show me the texts, that outline karma, in their original form.
I doubt that you can, or anybody.
Surely, there will be some remarks of rebirth and so on, and I would be
glad to know of their mentioning (the precise texts), but the concept of
the law of karma based on such texts alone, is not enough to present
them as scriptural. They are an invented concept.
Of course this does not say, that it might not be true or wrong, or not
be fit for eventual scientific proof, once the techniques will become
available for research on this level. Nevertheless, presenting the idea
other than with this addition/disclosure statement, is speculation.
Please show me that this (my) analysis is wrong.
>From Jan Hagen
hagen@igr.nl
|
||
|
||
| Advertise with us! |
|
|