If dharma is done for personal material gain, it does not
aid in this quest at all -- which is what makes it impermanent.
Mani
"Yogesh Patel [C]" <patelyg@cig.mot.com> writes:
>
> The fruits of "dharma" is heven -- which is not for ever.
> The fruits of "Bhakti" is "moksha" which is for ever.
> As Gita says, the purpose of Purusottam's incarnation on the Earth is
> to establish "dharms" not "Bhakti" -- But the fruits of "Dharma",
> compare to "Bhakti" are inferior and temporary.
>
> The question is:
>
> In waht ways, "Dharama" equvivalent to "Bhakti"?
>
Advertise with us! |
|