[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Is Improvement of Hindu Newsgroups the Goal?
In article <4di8kt$fq0@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
N. Tiwari <ntiwari@rs3.esm.vt.edu> wrote:
>GOPAL Ganapathiraju Sree Ramana (gopal@ecf.toronto.edu) wrote:
>: (2) do you have any "personal" objections to the proposed
>: moderators, that you can list?
>
>Ajay should answer that question. I have none. But
>selecting more moderators is useless at this time.
>Reason: Low traffic.
but i thought you have earlier stated that you support multiple
moderators, but want them picked up differently!
just for your ready reference, here it is:
==============================================================
Re: The SRH moderators
From: ntiwari@rs3.esm.vt.edu (N. Tiwari)
Date: 1995/12/28
MessageID: 4bv0b6$fi1@solaris.cc.vt.edu#1/1
[...........]
My argument was not that Ajay has to be the only moderator.
But then, let him be the moderator, and ensure that others
are also there. And these 'others' can be picked by us. The
netters. Rather than Shrisha and his friends.
Nachiketa Tiwari
