[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Tale and the SRH-reorg (Was: Re: Charter changes?)
-
To: ghen@netcom.com
-
Subject: Re: Tale and the SRH-reorg (Was: Re: Charter changes?)
-
From: Ramakrishnan Balasubramanian <rbalasub@ecn.purdue.edu>
-
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 1996 12:49:03 -0500
-
References: <4nd8fs$h2b@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <qum20iysz27.thoron@cyclone.Stanford.EDU> <4r8s22$16rt@bcx01.boco.co.gov> <4r92vf$m37@larry.rice.edu> <ghenDu9s2C.151@netcom.com> <ghenDuBB7z.1GE@netcom.com> <ghenDuExoq.DFM@netcom.com>
-
Sender: rbalasub@ecn.purdue.edu
Ken Stuart wrote:
>
> The major problem with this proposal is that SRH suffers from *too many*
posts
> being approved, not too many posts being rejected. If one Hindu ever
thought
> about the subject proposed, then that is enough for the post to be
accepted.
> :-) Furthermore, posts consisting of personal attacks on Hindu leaders
have
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> been accepted, as well as, amazingly enough, requests for negative and
> scandalous information about Hindu leaders.
I later realized the irony of your statement. Two of the gentlemen active in
the re-org have been responsible for many of the personal attacks on various
"Hindu" leaders, in ah and elsewhere, even to this date.
Ramakrishnan.
--
Two monks were arguing about a flag. One said, "The flag is moving." The other
said, "The wind is moving." The sixth patriarch happened to be passing by. He
told them, "Not the wind, not the flag; mind is moving." - The Gateless Gate
