[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH Reorg FAQ
[will be posted to srh separately
in addition to news.groups and sci]
In article <4shp90$bmm@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
Ramakrishnan Balasubramanian <rbalasub@ecn.purdue.edu> wrote:
[deleted most of the post, since it deals with past posts of
Vivek that i am not aware of]
i wrote earlier:
>> what bothers me is that instead of deciding whether *majority* of
>> readers consider the proposal as useful to the group, through a
>> usenet vote, the proposal is being killed because the current
>> moderator does not consent it.
to which you responded:
>That's between you and the moderator. I couldn't care less. Ofcourse I find it
>funny that some of the proponents want to shove their opinions on talking
>about religion+politics etc in srh down other people's throats and then talk
>about democracy in the USENET. A case of the pot calling the kettle black, I'd
>say.
>
>Ramakrishnan.
how can the proponents shove anything on the throats of srh readership?
they have been asking for a vote on the proposed separation of articles
into thoese that are primarily religious and those others that deal
with any other aspect hindu and hindism. if you are referring to the
general RFD and ancilliary threads appearing on the srh, i guess it
was decided by srh-moderator.
gopal
Follow-Ups:
