[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Hindu category is inferior to Vaisnava category?
In article <ghenDvCDu5.KGq@netcom.com>, Ccdsdg <ccdsdg@aol.com> wrote:
>
>The point that I'm trying to bring is that 'hindu' is not valid category
>to be
>compared in terms of logic. All 'birds' are 'wonderful', or none of
>'wonderful' are 'birds' In the same way you ask me if I say 'some
>wonderful are birds, and some are not.' But the terms are of a different
>nature. Wonderful are 'extraordinary', 'not horrible'.
You have gone totally tangent here. Hindu and Vaishnav are perfectly valid
for comparison. You can compare two things of similar nature. Is vaishnav
a quality or a man?
raja
