[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: ARTICLE : Who decided that all vaishnavs are not hindus



:    We have a situation here that some of the vaishnavs are not hindus.
:    Can you tell me the difference between vaishnav hindus, and so-called
:    non-vaishnav hindus. If there is no difference, then all vaishnavs must
:    be either hindu or non-hindu. Frankly I don't see any difference.

Hi,

The World Almanac gives 70% of the Hindus worldwide as being part of the
Vaishnava "denomination".  It does not specify Vaishnava as a separate
religion.  I'm not saying the Almanac is right or wrong, I'm merely giving
the opinion of a third party.

To me it would appear that a Hindu is one who respected or worshipped
_all_ the gods, kept all (or most) of the holidays and festivals.  And it
would appear that a non-Hindu Vaishnava would repect or worship all of the
facets of the Maha-Vishnu (including possibly Lakshmi and Hanuman), but
would not participate in festivals of other gods.  While the Hindu
Vaishnava would respect and/or worship all deities, the Maha-Vishnu would
be the chief deity.

Would a member of the Vaishnava relgion attend a diwali festival or would
their attendance compromise their faith?  A member of the Vaishnava
denomination would attend.  While a member of the Vaishnava denomination
might / would attend a Shiva festival, a member of the Vaishnava relgion
wouldn't.

Because 70% of all Hindus are Vaishnava (include Vaishnava religion), they
have a supermajority of all Hinduism.  They are able to hold themselves
separate from Hinduism and make their own rules to a large extent.  (A
similar parallel would be Chatholics and Christianity.  I've known some
non-Christian who thought that all Christians call their service mass and
all Christians have a priest, just like the Chatholics.)

Bests,

Jay


Advertise with us!
This site is part of Dharma Universe LLC websites.
Copyrighted 2009-2015, Dharma Universe.